Playing approach shots

How do you make decisions connected to the approach shot? What shot does the course designer want you to hit to the green? What hazards does a designer incorporate into the landing area from the tee shot, what is the length of the approach shot? As the length decreases to the green you can typically expect to encounter more hazards of increasing severity.

On par 3s where there is no landing area you can expect deep bunkers, swales and hummocks around the green and often rough which is difficult to escape from. This is less likely on par 4s and par 5s because you will have challenges in the lie, stance and angle from your approach shot. If that approach shot is relatively short there may be hazards in the landing area to punish a poor shot. The fairway may be narrowed by rough or bunkers to force players to lay up short to a safe area or to hit longer to carry beyond the hazard. Sand dunes and fairway bunkers can narrow the landing area towards the green.

Bunkers positioned at 40 yards or further from the green present a difficult problem. It’s too far to explode the ball from the sand and land it onto the green. 

As you walk towards your approach shot you will see features that may not be apparent from further away, The rough may be taller, bunkers may be deeper or steeper and slopes may have more inclination. You may notice grassy hollows, pot bunkers or subtle mounds. Looking at these characteristics in closer detail you’ll be able to form a clearer picture of their potential effects on your approach shot.

It’s unlikely that two par 4s of similar length will be defended in the same way. Some can be defended by bunkers at the green – another may have much stronger contouring of the putting surface making it more challenging so the defences around the green will be less.

Before you address your approach shot see what you can work out about the green’s size and shape. Next, determine whether the green is flat, convex or concave.

Concave or ‘bowled’ greens make the ball roll towards the centre of the green, Concave or “crowned’ greens are more difficult because approach shots tend to roll off them. Course designer Donald Ross used convex greens as his signature. Check the scorecard for a diagram of the green and walk round the landing area to get a better view.

Once you’ve determined the size and shape of the green, carefully see where the pin is located. Then decide where you want to land your approach shot given the location of the pin and the green’s shape and size. 

On uphill holes the green is often pitched from back to front for improved visibility, Shots that carry too far may require you to negotiate a tricky downhill pitch or chip back onto the green. 

Course designers often incorporate slopes or mounds into the green. These can be defensive or penal so determine whether it can help you get close to the flagstick and factor this into your shot selection. Be aware that some mounds will be completely out of play for a certain shot but may be important with a different flagstick position or angle of approach. Slopes in the green may deflect a ball away from the putting surface they may be used to work a shot into a particular pin position. Always consider the severity or degree of tilt to determine how the ball will react when it lands. The greater the tilt, the larger the effect and the more the ball will move when it deflects off the mound or slope. 

Designers generally use swales and grassy hollows to help surface drainage of the green. They test your ability to execute different recovery shots. Drainage is one of the most important issues that golf course designers deal with and swales and hollows can contain a drain for capturing water run off.

Swales are shallower than grassy hollows – where the grass is maintained at fairway height you are presented with a variety of choices of shot. Chip, pitch, bump and run or putt. Shot selection can be just as important as execution. If the grass is maintained as rough you will need to pitch the ball out. Hollows are usually deep and can obstruct your view of the putting surface or bottom of the flagstick. They are usually maintained at rough height, limiting recovery options to high lob shots with lofted clubs, The slopes on grassy hollows can be steep. The course designer wants to encourage you to take a safe escape route rather than a daring recovery.

The fringe surrounding the putting surface is an important feature. This small section of two to three feet wide grass can have a major effect on shorter approach shots. When playing from bunkers or rough near the green you are often forced to land the ball in this area to get it close to the hole. The height, texture and condition of the grass become extremely important. For example at Riviera Country Club in Los Angeles very tangly kikuyu grass presents a strong challenge. The best way to tell what confronts you is to closely survey the area itself and walk on the fringe to feel how firm it is.

The lower or tighter the grass is manicured, the greater the opportunity to keep the ball low to the ground by running, chipping or putting. The longer the grass the more you will need to elevate the ball by pitching or lobbing it. Take this factor into account before you select your shot.

At the US Open the USGA sets up courses to have deep heavy rough. As a result this makes using the short game very challenging chipping pitching and bump and run are rendered treacherous. 

Look at the entrance to the green. It will also play a part in determining the shots that will get you on the green. An open entrance will allow you to bounce the ball on to the green, Another type of entrance is where the fairway connects directly into the putting surface where there is no elevation. This is used where a long approach shot is required. It opens up options to bounce roll pitch bump and run, chip or putt onto the green. With a short approach you may find a narrow entrance only half the width of a green, 

Another type of entrance is a narrow runway that sweeps between bunkers or other features to an elevated green. This requires an accurate shot to get through the runway onto the wider green. The elevation will slow or stop an approach shot. With this type of runway entrance the course designer intends you to attack the green through the air rather than use the runway to bump and run a shot on the ground.

Another type of entrance is a side angle one. The front portion of the green is closed with bunkers or other obstacles but an alternate route is created to the side of the green by looping a a portion of the fairway around the obstacles giving players another entry option.

Sometimes there is no entrance because the designer has cut off the front of the green with bunkers, rough or other hazards, forcing you to carry the ball to the putting surface. These situations force you to play a safe shot to the green.

The closer you get to the green full shots are no longe possible and delicate, finesse shots must be mastered. Pitching, chipping, punch shots – low trajectory shots to combat the wind but played close enough to the ground to avoid any major obstacles that need to be carried.

The bump and run shot lands short of the green and then utilises the slopes and contours to help the ball work its way toward the hole. Through the incorporation of entrance areas, swales and other manicured features, designers frequently create opportunities to play the bump and run around greens as a means of testing a player’s feel and touch. The trick is in working out how hard to hit the shot, where to land the ball and how far the ball will roll.

Another shot is the lob shot which can be played from anywhere around the green – from deep rough, grassy hollows or a manicured fairway The lob, also known as a flop shot is the best way to deal with green side defences that require a short carry such as a deep bunker or a water hazard, It is also useful in negotiating major slopes and undulations on the putting surface.

Another useful shot from just off the green is the Texas wedge. This is played with a putter and can even be played from a bunker with no lip or face or the light rough around the putting surface. It can provide better distance control in many situations just off the putting surface. There is less risk of mis hitting it than a short pitch or chip. For players that don’t play often or beginner players the Texas wedge is easier to execute than other recovery shots, especially if your lie is bare, tight or less than perfect. 

The importance of the approach shot to the green cannot be underestimated. The more proficient you become in manoeuvring the ball to the hole, the easier time you will have on the greens.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jeremy Clarkson watches golf

Screenshot

When American Billy Horschel won the BMW PGA Championship it was his love of West Ham United that cemented his ties to the UK. With today’s winner J J Spaun, it is Jeremy Clarkson… so much so that JJ’s wife walked round the course holding a mask of Jeremy so it looked like he was supporting him in his gallery. 

JJ explained “we’ve grown fond of him, along with the English culture. We actually take holidays in December in the Cotswolds and we really enjoy his show. I went to his pub, the Farmer’s Dog, with the hopes to catch a glimpse of him!

Challenge to Jeremy Clarkson to put down the pitchfork and pick up a golf club!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Should have picked JJ

Congratulations to J J Spaun who has won the BMW PGA Championship at Wentworth Club on his first attempt. JJ birdied 4 out of the final 5 holes in his last round to finish at -17 beating Manuel Elvira, Rory McIlroy, Aaron Rai and Adam Scott who were all tied on -15.

His ‘W’ as he called it is the perfect answer to American captain Brandt Schnedeker leaving JJ out of next week’s Presidents Cup side. Once again in team matches a place was given to Justin Thomas controversially. JJ Spaun is 10th in the Presidents Cup standings, the 2025 US Open Champion and a current Ryder Cup player. 

“I’ve always wanted to be a global player” he said “I’m so glad there was time in my schedule to come over to England and play here”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Duff Foreman, your AI golf commentator

Screenshot

Last week while the mainstream news was discussing the dangers of Artificial Intelligence to society a new sportscaster slipped on to You Tube with little fanfare. He commented on the New Mexico Open alongside Ryan Burr and Notah Begay III.

Hello World from the first Al generated golf commentator, Duff Foreman.

The Al has been created by Copher Hole Production, a company that develops Al powered personalities. Neither the wooden commentary (what is minus five under) nor the weird Scottish accent it occasionally lapsed into, was impressive.

This reminds us that while Al is being developed very fast, some of it is not that good.

I felt lazy this week and asked ChatGPT for a list of the scores of the Solheim Cup singles matches. Within 5 seconds it came back with the list. I looked at it and thought “Seriously, you’ve just told me that Mimi Rhodes beat Nelly Korda on Sunday?”

So I wrote a prompt saying “This is not correct. World Number 1 player Nelly Korda won her match against Mimi Rhodes. Please check the scores again”.

In ten seconds this time I got the correct scores. But I only knew they were correct because I checked each one against the Official Solheim Cup website and two social media outlets. All taking time. The reply had been prefaced with this comment from the AI:

“I apologize. I got three scores wrong. Thank you for correcting me.”

Three scores wrong?! You have one job.

If I had not spotted the mistake and just relied on the Al to do the work for me and used it – it would have made my content inaccurate. Therefore it cannot totally be trusted to provide accurate facts. This is the second time in two weeks I’ve caught ChatGPT out giving inaccurate facts. As this is the Al that most people use for general knowledge it shows that the progress of training Al is not as advanced as some of the panic mongers in the media are saying. I also find its “pat on the head’ tone rather patronising at times. CoPilot usually works for me and Claude is excellent for more complex work, but none of them are fail proof.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2026 Solheim Cup Day Three

Going into the singles matches, Europe needed 6½ points to reclaim the Cup, while the USA needed 6. Europe produced an outstanding 7–5 singles victory, winning the Solheim Cup 15–13

Screenshot

Charley Hull beat Megan Khang 3&2

Esther Henseleit was beaten by Alison Lee 1 up

Linn Grant beat Angel Yin 4&3

Mimi Rhodes was beaten by Nelly Korda 4&2

Nanna Koerstz Madsen beat Allisen Corpuz 2&1

Nastasia Nadaud beat Andrea Lee 3&2

Julia Lopez Ramirez beat Yealimi Noh 3&2

Lottie Woad beat Auston Kim 2&1

Leona Maguire was beaten by Lauren Coughlin 2&1

Maja Stark was beaten by Lindy Duncan 3&1

Carlotta Ciganda beat Jennifer Kupcho 4&2

Celine Boutier was beaten by Rose Zhang 2 up.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2026 Solheim Cup Day Two

Screenshot

Team Europe and Team USA are tied at 8-8 heading into the final day of the Solheim Cup at Bernadus Golf in the Netherlands. Day two produced a great turnaround in the atternoon atter europe won the foursomes in the morning 3-1 to gain a 7-5 lead.

In the morning Maja Stark and Linn Grant beat Nelly Korda and Allisen Corpuz 3&2. This was the Americans’ first defeat after winning five Solheim Cup matches together. Mimi Rhodes and Nastasia Nadaud beat Andrea Lee and Auston Kim 4&3. This was a superb performance from Europe’s two rookies. They become the first rookie partnership to win two matches at a single Solheim Cup. Leona Maguire and Esther Henseleit beat Jennifer Kupcho and Rose Zhang 1 up. This went all the way to the 18th with Henseleit producing crucial, ate magic helping Europe take the morning session 3-1. Alison Lee and Lauren Coughlin from the United States beat Charley Hull and Lottie Woad 6&5. The result equalled the record for the biggest defeat in a Solheim Cup Foursomes match.

n the afternoon session the opening fourball match Maja Stark and Linn Grant beat Lauren Coughlin and Megan Khang 2&1. The Swedes were the standout partnership of Day Two and are now 3-0 for the week. Before this match, Khang had won six consecutive Solheim Cup matches, while Coughlin has been unbeaten in her seven career appearances. The result gave Europe 8-5 lead.

Then began the Team USA comeback. Rose Zhang and Auston Kim beat Nastasia Nadaud and Leona Maguire 3&2. Yealimi Noh and Andrea Lee then beat Lottie Woad and Charley Hull 1 up after the Europeans were unable to convert opportunities late in the match. Despite being amongst Europe’s top players, they have only won half a point from four matches together.

This brought the result to 8-7 with one match left out on the course.

In the match of Carlotta Ciganda and Celine Boutier v Jennifer Kupcho and Lindy Duncan, Europe were 1 up with two holes to play. But on the 17th green Jennifer Kupcho holed a 90 foot putt to win the hole to bring the natch all square. On the 18th green Jennifer Kupcho holed another crucia O foot putt to win the hole and the match 1 up. That meant that Team US won the session 3-1.

On the Team USA bus leaving Bernardus Golf Captain Angela Stanford handed round celbratory beers. Team Europe waited until Sunday before they drank theirs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2026 Solheim Cup Day One

Screenshot

Solheim Cup Fourballs matches just begun with a vibrant, super charged first tee crowd supporting. The score after this morning’s Foursomes is Europe 2-United States 2. Nelly Korda and Allisen Corpuz were on sparkling form creating a new record of unbeaten 5 foursomes matches together winning 4&3 this morning beating Charley Hull and Lottie

Alison Lee and Lauren Coughlin defeated Nanna Koerstz Madsen and Celine Boutier 3&2in rainy, windy conditions.

Swedish duo Maya Stark and Linn Grant brought in Team Europe’s first point defeating Rose Zhang and Jennifer Kupcho 3&2. Leona Maguire and Esther Henseleit won a clutch match 2 up against Andrea Lee and Lindy Duncan.

Course is playing long in the wet and windy conditions with the back nine a

European Captain Anna Nordqvist said “it’s a solid start, We’re really excited and right on track”. She didn’t really expand on why she had rested the two winning teams in the afternoon though.

Enjoyable matches, though the music blaring from the first tee warming the supporters up for the afternoon matches must have been distracting for the final group still out on the course hearing it.

Here are the pairings for the afternoon Fourball matches. Times BST+1

1.05 Charley Hull and Lottie Woad (Europe) v

Yealimi Noh and Angel Yin (USA)

1.20 Celine Boutier and Nanna Koerst Madsen (Europe) v

Megan Khang and Alison Lee

1.35 Mimi Rhodes and Nastasia Nadaud (Europe) v

Allisen Corpuz and Auston Kim (Kim)

1.50 Carlotta Ciganda and Julia Lopez Ramirez (Europe) v

Nelly Korda and Lauren Coughlin (USA)

for the first time in Solheim Cup history both sessions are tied with the result after day 1 Team Europe 4, Team USA 4.

A dramatic finish on the 18th green saw Europe’s Carlotta Ciganda sink a crucial putt after Americans Nelly Korda and Lauren Coughlin both left theirs short. It had looked bleak for Europe after Ciganda sent her approach far left and teammate Julia Lopez Ramirez’s bunker shot struck the lip and stayed in. The unexpected half-point gave Europe a psychological edge heading into Saturday’s foursomes.

In the opening match Charley Hull and Lottie Woad tied Yealimi Noh and Angel Yin. Twice the Europeans were 3 up in this match but both times the Americans won back to back holes to get to 1 down. On the 17th hole Noh’s birdie drew team USA to all square. On the 18th green Lottie Woad seemed distracted by the music blaring from the fan village and her birdie putt slid by the left edge, Noh’s 12 foot putt veered off to the left. It would be good to see Charley play with a different partner tomorrow, perhaps her friend Esther Heseleit.

Megan Khang and Alison Lee had a big 5 and 3 win over Celine Boutier and an out of sorts Nanna Koerst Madsen. Lee made eagle to win the 10th, then the Americans had birdies on 11,13,14 for a dominant win.

Mimi Rhodes and Natasia Nadaud defeated Americans Allisen Corpuz and Auston Kim 2 and 1. The European rookie pairing took the lead on the 10th and never again trailed. Naudaud won the 12th with birdie and Rhodes had another on 13. Mimi Rhodes said “it was just a lot of fun out there, the chemistry was unreal and it felt really comfortable”.

Ciganda said of her match “it was really tough against Nely and Lauren but we fought hard and at least we got half a point which I think is really important”.

The music blaring from the fan village distracting players is not acceptable.It’s the Solheim Cup, not defunct LIV.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How will LIV restructure?

From Golf Digest:

LIV Golf announced a proposed restructuring agreement that could transfer majority ownership of the league to its players.
The filing, showed that several of LIV’s biggest names—including Jon Rahm, Bryson DeChambeau, Dustin Johnson and Cameron Smith—are owed millions of dollars. LIV also hopes the proceedings will extend U.S. bankruptcy protections to its international assets.

Under the proposed restructuring, London-based private-equity firm BC Partners would finance an attempted return in 2027 through what LIV described as a “recapitalization transaction.” The plan requires court approval. 

Questions remain about the nature of the firm’s commitment, including whether the financing is structured as a loan, dependent upon additional investors or contingent upon a number of players remaining with the league.

“This process gives us the structure and time to pursue a landmark transaction and begin the next chapter of LIV Golf—one built around the fans, an innovative, player-first ownership model, and a part of the global golf ecosystem,” LIV CEO Scott O’Neil said in a press release. “We are excited about what lies ahead and yet, there is still much to accomplish in the months ahead. We believe deeply in LIV Golf’s future, the opportunity in front of us, and the people who will help us realize it. We are grateful to our players, the incredible team at LIV Golf, our Board, BC Partners, and our partners all over the world standing tall with us, and we thank them for their belief in our next chapter.”

The restructuring would likely release LIV players from their existing contracts, allowing them to pursue opportunities elsewhere. Golf Digest reported earlier this year that agents representing several LIV players had contacted the PGA Tour and DP World Tour to explore possible paths back.

The bankruptcy filing had been expected for months after Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund withdrew its financial support from the five-year-old league. It comes a little more than a week after LIV terminated most of its remaining staff. LIV concluded its 2026 season in Indianapolis in late August, one week earlier than scheduled after canceling its planned finale in Michigan. The shortened finish followed months of questions about the league’s finances and future.

PIF has agreed to provide nearly $50 million in debtor-in-possession financing, which would allow LIV to continue operating during the proceedings. BC Partners and other prospective investors are expected to provide financing once the league emerges from Chapter 11.

PIF announced in April that it would stop funding LIV as part of a broader shift toward domestic projects and away from global investments that had failed to produce sufficient returns. The economic effects of the regional war with Iran also placed greater pressure on the sovereign wealth fund’s holdings. The sportswashing experiment cost an estimated $5 billion to $8 billion from its 2021 launch through this year. Yasir Al-Rumayyan—PIF’s governor, LIV’s architect and the chairman of its board—resigned after the funding was withdrawn.

LIV’s financial troubles have extended beyond its players. Several contractors say they have not been paid for their work, while the league also faces a lawsuit from the Premier Golf League alleging breach of confidence and conspiracy by unlawful means.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LIV Golf files for bankruptcy

And here it is. The historic announcement from BBC Sport.

LIV Golf has filed for bankruptcy protection as it attempts to restructure after Saudi Arabia withdrew its multibillion dollar funding – a move that means all its players are free to leave.

A Chapter 11 petition, which LIV says is to “preserve the company’s business”, was filed in the United States on Tuesday.

The breakaway league says it has found a new investor in BC Partners, following the decision in April by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) to pull its funding.

LIV Golf intends to commence its new majority player-owned league early next year and it is understood the Chapter 11 process allows it to start talking to players about their participation in LIV’s future.

BBC Sport understands there is no obligation on players to sign on to LIV 2.0, regardless of whether they had previously signed multi-year contracts with LIV Golf.

Sources have said contracts under the previous iteration of LIV Golf will finish because of this court filing, with amounts owed to players and other creditors addressed through the court process.

However, it remains unclear when players would then be able to enter discussions with other tours.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

They’ll Always Have Lahinch

The Miracle at Medinah, the Duel in the Sun and now the Legend of Lahinch. What happened at the weekend in the Walker Cup is right up there in history with the most thrilling, epic, hard fought wins in all the sport.

Who would have thought? It was an almost ridiculous win that had those of us who love golf spellbound as the entire result came down to the final putt on the 18th green. A tricky four foot putt holed quickly by Josh Hill, the 93rd best amateur in the world.

Having lost all four Sunday foursomes, the Great Britain and Ireland team went into the team room at lunch needing inspiration. The mood changed when the music blared out, not just any song but Wonderwall, England’s anthem of the World Cup summer. “Maybe, you’re gonna be the one that saves me, and after all you’re my wonderwall”.

Stuart Grehan said that was it, “F… it. We’re beating those American boys” possibly not least after American Preston Stout shouted to his team, “we’re dream crushing now”. Grehan, the Irish reinstated amateur, relished overcoming a deficit to beat Stout 2&1 in the opening match.

With thousands of spectators following each match along each fairway the atmosphere was excitable, loud and joyous, more like a Ryder Cup match. Professional Ian Poulter was watching his son Luke dispatch Ethan Fang 3&1. “Magical” he described it. As a nod to his dad’s European Ryder Cup nickname “The Postman” Luke Poulter was then dubbed “The Paper Boy”.

Jack Whaley, the US Amateur Champion from England gave William Jennings a drubbing 8&7, the largest winning margin in Walker Cup History.

The United States team only had two singles wins – Ryder Cowan and Josiah Gilbert, the last two men out, and two halved matches Niall Sheils Donegan and Kihei Akina, and Connor Grahan and Miles Russell.

GB&I’s Tyler Weaver also had a big win 4&3  against Jay Leng Jnr. Eliot Baker won 1 up against Stewart Hagestad, going down the 18th hole, he had to get something out of the match as did Josh Hill. It was all on a knife edge, but they both delivered, right down to Josh Hill’s 4 foot birdie putt.

It was the biggest comeback in the history of the Walker Cup, on a par with the 2012 Medinah Ryder Cup – that was a 4 point deficit but there were 12 singles – this Walker Cup was a 3 point deficit but with 10 singles.

The joyous scenes on the 18th green – even the officials in blazers were huggling and emotional – led to an almighty party in a Lahinch pub where, to their credit, the American Captain Nathan Smith and several of his team showed good sportsmanship came and joined the drinking and singing.

It’s been interesting to hear the American media’s impressions, whingey some of them were. “Can’t believe it, the US blew it. We expect to win the singles”. “Everything aligned for them – it never ever happens to the US in these team competitions”. Apparently the American broadcast had a funeral tone “they’re running out of time”.

Although the American dominance in the Walker Cup is undeniable 42 wins to 10 for Great Britain and Ireland, this is a good result for the future of the competition. The Americans already have their Walker Cup venues pencilled in up to 2052. In terms of pure competitive drama it’s the best ending of a team golf competition ever. From our side of the Atlantic it was great, compelling television.

Do changes need to be made?

I tend to agree that a three day format might be better – even for young golfers 36 holes a day is hard work mentally and physically. I’d like to see fourballs included as in the Ryder Cup as it’s a more aggressive format. There’s too much emphasis on the singles in the Walker Cup – 18 singles points and 8 team play shots.

 In time, maybe the format could move from GB&I to include Europe. But look at the rankings in this match – the average world amateur ranking of the United States team was 8.3, the GB&I team average is 40. And still the Americans were outplayed – they did not collapse, they didn’t blow it, they got outplayed.

Stuart Greehan made a great contribution to the GB&I team but his place on the team raises the question about reinstated amateurs. He played as a professional for six years but only won $40,000 at it. However, there have been a lot of former American former professionals who have come back to play Walker Cup golf. Perhaps this should finish. The purity of this amateur team event is distinctive. We all love professional golf, but this is different.

And many of the players this week are now off to the professional ranks. However their careers work out, they will have already experienced something out of this world.

For the rest of their lives -they’ll always have Lahinch.

Screenshot

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment